double secret vote taken to disallow double secret vote taking?

Standard

 

Image 

in the frequently stunning public arena known as politics, the following scenario recently played out at a local city council meeting :

3 members of the city council abstained from voting on a measure that would have prevented them from abstaining on future votes. 1 city council member had proposed a resolution that would have required each member to only vote yes or no on each issue. the mayor and 2 council members abstained. the resolution failed. i have chosen to abstain from stating my opinion on this matter. 

______

 Remember that it is not enough to abstain from lying by word of mouth; for the worst lies are often conveyed by a false look, smile, or act. 

 Abraham Cahan quotes  

 


Discover more from I didn't have my glasses on....

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

31 responses »

  1. To be fair to the abstainers, any resolution removing “abstain” as a voting choice is ridiculous to begin with. Sometimes abstaining is necessary — often when an elected official does not feel that they are able — for whatever reason — to vote for the resolution that is on the agenda — often this occurs when the voter has a conflict of interest or does not feel properly informed (sometimes office holders miss work sessions/meetings for valid reasons).

    Like

  2. Off with their heads! Sorry – I just read a post on Lewis Carroll and I’m really feeling the Red Queen right now. It seems appropriate in this case and for all the politicians playing politics with our lives. Nice post.

    Like

Leave a reply to markyrog Cancel reply