Most of what I heard was exactly what you’d expect. Polished, predictable, professionally programmed stations delivering familiar formats. They weren’t bad. They were just interchangeable. I moved past them without thinking.
Then I landed on something different: WCOO, 105.5 The Bridge. Within minutes I realized I was hearing something I hadn’t encountered in a long time — a station with a point of view. They played familiar songs, but not always the obvious ones. Many had been hits long ago but had largely disappeared from radio. At one point they played Leon Russell’s Stranger in a Strange Land. I lit up — I had never heard that song on the radio before, except when I aired it myself decades ago. They also played songs I didn’t recognize at all, from bands I’d never heard of. None of it felt random. The whole package held together.
Not every song grabbed me. Most were simply part of the station’s overall sound, and made the station feel coherent. And because that coherence was there, the occasional song that did connect landed with unusual force. I found myself leaving the dial alone, letting the station carry me wherever it was going.
That experience reminded me of something about blogging.
Your blog is a radio station.
Every time you publish a post, you are programming your station. You are choosing what goes into rotation. Some post types are your familiars, the topics and themes readers already associate with you. Some are deeper cuts, things that matter to you but may not matter to everyone. Some are experiments, signals sent into the dark to see if anyone recognizes them.
Most posts will not stop a new visitor in their tracks. Most simply establish the contours of your sensibility. They create the sound of your station.
Readers don’t arrive knowing they need you. They arrive the way I arrived at WCOO: by accident, by curiosity, by wandering. They sample what you’re transmitting. Most move on quickly, not because your signal is weak, but because it isn’t their frequency. Affinity is selective by nature. But a few hear something that resonates — something familiar, or something unexpectedly right. Those readers stay. They come back. Over time, they stop evaluating individual posts and start trusting the station itself.
Search engines and social media made it seem as if blogging were about being findable. They encouraged us to think in terms of traffic, optimization, and reach. Those things can increase the number of people who briefly pass through your frequency range. They can’t manufacture recognition. Recognition happens when your signal is clear and consistent enough that the right person thinks, “Right on!” when they hear it.
The job of a blogger is not to capture everyone. The job is to transmit something real, building a body of work that sounds like itself, so that when someone out there is twisting the dial and lands on your station, they hear something they didn’t know they were looking for, and decide to stay awhile.
You don’t control who tunes in. You control only what you transmit. – Jim Grey
—
note/source credits: (both former radio dj’s)
I felt that this described blogging perfectly after recently reading a repost from my blogging friend Keith, from ‘Various Ramblings of a Nostalgic Italian https://nostalgicitalian.com/
Original post written by Jim Grey (of ‘Down the Road’). To get Down the Road in your inbox or reader six days a week, click here to subscribe
Discover more from I didn't have my glasses on....
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Great post, Beth, and so true!
LikeLike
Wow, this has been so true of my blogging experience. Everyone I have found, or try to follow consistently, its because they reonate on the right frequency. Hopefully, it works the same in reverse. I know I can not handle too many followers, so growing has never been a priority, just writing and sharing. Even now, I feel overwhelmed with the little I have.
I love the points you’ve raised in this piece, Beth.
LikeLike
thank you beth, that was a Heureka moment for me – confirming what I deep down knew for many, many years. I ‘follow’ bloggers loosely or firmly, as it fits my ‘demands’. Some I read occasionally, others I may not read for some time BUT when I am ‘available’, I catch up with. Others I unsubscribe. Some I start following for a moment and then go off. As it is with radio stations. And that’s why I’m still missing, many years later, some of them because I can’t follow them from other countries. What a great post that was.
LikeLike
That’s a really good comparison, Beth. Back in 2015 I tried to categorise blogs and bloggers in my own way.
Best wishes, Pete.
LikeLike
An apt description, Beth. Thank you for sharing your blogging friends’ words.
LikeLike
I had that Leon Russel album ! I love posts that are authentic, imbued with the writer’s voice and experience. I don’t want broad, marshmallow posts with hush puppy voices . —
LikeLike
My blog site is where I post/broadcast my poems. I write poetry because I feel for the world around me, I notice things most people rush past — the breath of morning light, the hush of the wind in the trees, the way a song can echo nature’s existence. And I like to keep showing up to my page with honesty, curiosity, and my unmistakable ‘Ivor’ warmth.
LikeLike